SAP engineering, senior-led.

DEBCOR provides senior-led SAP engineering across the full programme lifecycle, organised into four intent tracks. Transform: BTP clean-core extensions, Integration Suite, PI/PO migration, proprietary data-migration tools and programmes. Migrate: ERP consulting (vendor-neutral), GROW with SAP (S/4HANA Public Cloud), RISE with SAP (S/4HANA Private Cloud), ECC end-of-support planning ahead of 2027. Optimise: AMS / Managed Services with the Company Intelligence Layer, performance optimisation, SAP-integrated payment card and ACH solutions. Lead: PMO services (including Tactical PMO for rescue), Fractional CTO advisory, mentoring from executive level to engineering team. DEBCOR is an SAP Gold Partner ranked #5 in the United States on SAP PartnerFinder, an SAP Build and Service Partner, and an Anthropic Claude Preferred Services Partner.

All three, scoped to fit the work. Fixed-bid is the default for discrete, well-defined deliverables — assessments, single-track migrations, product implementations, scoped rescue interventions — because it gives the client price certainty without losing engineering quality. Time and materials is used where scope is genuinely uncertain (early-stage strategy, exploratory architecture work) and only with explicit not-to-exceed ceilings. Managed Services is the long-running structure: quarterly outcomes, the Company Intelligence Layer compounding client-specific knowledge across the engagement, and the AI Platform doing the foundational work the team would otherwise be paying DEBCOR engineers to repeat. DEBCOR does not chase change orders to grow scope — that is a deliberate, founder-set model.

Senior engineers, plus the AI Platform that lets them work at scale. DEBCOR fields 100+ senior SAP DEBCOR engineers globally and structures engagements so the decisions — architecture, design, exception handling, integration patterns — are made by people with 15+ years of SAP delivery experience. The compressed work (data prep, code classification, blueprint drafting, ticket triage) is handled by the AI Platform with senior review. The result is a smaller team than traditional model-mix consultancies need, with senior representation on every track. DEBCOR's Chief Architect holds every SAP architect-tier certification SAP currently offers — Enterprise Architect, Solution Architect BTP, Data Architect BDC, and LeanIX — plus the SAP Generative AI Developer credential. That is the calibre of judgment at the top of every engagement.

For assessments and Fractional CTO engagements, within one to two weeks of contract signing. For implementation work, the standard mobilisation window is 4–6 weeks — used for landscape inventory (often AI-accelerated), team formation, and the governance/audit baseline the AI Platform requires before any agent acts. Rescue Squad engagements move faster when the client situation warrants: DEBCOR has stood up rescue teams in under two weeks for failing programmes, including the public McLarens reference (Fortune 500 insurer, $30M stalled programme, delivered in five months across 54 countries). The honest constraint is normally not DEBCOR's bench — it is the client's procurement and security review cycle.

Yes — and this is more common than not. DEBCOR is frequently brought in to augment an SI's delivery (deep BTP, AI on SAP, master data, or integration tracks), to lead a workstream the SI is not strong in, or to perform an independent assurance read on programme health. The relationship works because DEBCOR's engagement model does not depend on owning the entire programme: senior judgment on a specific track, the AI Platform compressing the foundational work, and a clean handover or run-state at the end. This pattern is especially common in regulated environments where the lead SI lacks BTP or AI depth.

A focused assessment or Fractional CTO advisory month — typically USD $25k–$75k. The cap on small engagements is not scope; it is whether the work is meaningful enough to assign a senior engineer to. A two-week landscape inventory or a Clean Core Readiness Assessment routinely pays for itself by surfacing scope or risk the client would otherwise discover after a six-figure SI commitment. The mistake to avoid is splitting a real programme into too-small phases — that creates handover overhead which erases the savings.